Skip to main content

Our **ed-up healthcare system

If you've followed my blog from the start, you may recall that I had a brain MRI in Germany. It cost 843 Euros, or less than $900. (We paid the full cost out-of-pocket and were reimbursed 100%.) When we told the staff how much an MRI in the US costs, they were incredulous.

Earlier this week, I paid for my portion of the MRI I had last month. It cost nearly $11,000 dollars, of which I paid $461. 

But wait, there's more. 

Before I met my deductible earlier this year, I discovered that I was paying $126 per month for the large (at-home) oxygen concentrator that I haven't used in about 15 months. (After I hit my deductible, I pay 10%, or $12.60. My portable costs $36 before deductible and $3.60 after, so $16/month total.) I asked my pulmonologist to write a script indicating that I only need the portable concentrator (for exercise) and don't need the large concentrator. (You can't get a portable anywhere--used or new--without a prescription, so I can't just go buy one on Amazon or eBay.) 

Long story short, PSU's Highmark concierge, who often investigates these problems for me, was told by the oxygen supplier that they are a package deal: you can't have the portable unless you also have the large concentrator. Why? Because otherwise they wouldn't make enough money!!!!! They admitted this to her.

Imagine going to CVS to get a prescription for, say, amoxicillin. It comes to $5. But then they tell you, "You also have to order this other antibiotic for $20, even though you don't need it. Otherwise we wouldn't make enough money. So if you want the amoxicillin, you have buy buy this other medication, too."

That is what these oxygen companies are doing. The Highmark concierge called around to see if any other suppliers would provide only the portable concentrator. Nope. They all operate this way -- essentially stealing money from insurance companies, employers, patients, and the public.

This system is so ass-backwards: forcing people and insurance companies to pay for treatments/supplies that aren't needed. So I've been paying, and will continue to pay, about $375 per year for an apparatus that is just sitting in the basement collecting dust. 

***
This year I'm serving as a Faculty Senator on the Faculty Benefits Committee, which pertains to health insurance, among other benefits, for all employees (except for unionized Teamsters). I was dismayed to learn that HR is considering requiring prior authorization for advanced imaging such as CT scans, MRIs, and PET scans. I obviously have a personal stake in this, but more importantly, research shows that in many cases, prior auth delays, interrupts, or denies care, resulting in worse health outcomes (not to mention bureaucratic headaches for doctors). 

This is a hill I will die on. (Note to self: cut back on # of hills I will die on.) I've learned that research shows there are some conditions, such as orthopedics (e.g., knee or back pain), where early advanced imaging doesn't lead to better outcomes. So prior auth would make sense in those cases. I'm working on plans to demand/request that HR get data from Highmark about their prior auth plan and whether it would apply to advanced imaging for certain conditions or all conditions, including cancer, as well as the denial rates and reasons and how many appeals are overturned. In true Penn State fashion, the document discussing the proposed changes is confidential...but that doesn't mean I can't talk about it.

Since I was in Germany when I was diagnosed with lung cancer, I didn't need prior auth for anything (we paid everything up-front and were then reimbursed). When my doctor said I should get a CT scan, I just went down the street to the nearest imaging clinic. My doctors at the LungenClinic didn't need prior auth for the CT scans, MRI, or genetic testing. I wonder how long my diagnosis and treatment might have been delayed if I'd been in the US. One reason we decided to stay in Germany for my treatment rather than flying home 6 weeks early is that I could start targeted therapy just 2 weeks after my biopsy--and that is exactly what happened. I could be wrong, but I cannot imagine that quick of a timeline happening here. 

Comments

  1. That is so messed up. I can't even imagine. I can't begin to understand how people without really good insurance manage. And then, those who do have it are being gouged!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Lately I’ve been wondering if most of our galacial pace to align with EU standards is because after 300 years we still don’t know who is in charge… and when we find out, they’ve resigned or onto something else. Also, I have this analogy for other things like sustainability issues; it’s like we’re in middle school while they’ve acquired their PhD.

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Healthcare costs and insurance woes and victories

Those of you who have read this blog from the beginning may recall my posts about how inexpensive healthcare is in Germany compared to the US. I now have additional proof. I've been receiving "explanation of benefits" statements from Aetna detailing the cost of my hospital stays and other healthcare services since the end of July. Close your eyes and guess how much these amount to. Higher. No, higher. Still higher. Well over $200,000. Of that, I have paid maybe $100 plus some $20-30 co-pays for doctor's visits. Add to that my cancer and blood thinner medications, which would cost about $16,000 per month without insurance. I have no idea what people in my situation do if they are uninsured or under-insured. My recent interaction with one of my German doctors illustrates another stark difference. Before leaving Germany, I had asked my doctor what to do if I received bills from the LungenClinic after we had moved and closed our Deutsche Bank account (all bills in Germany...

Indolent nodules

We met with my oncologist (Dr. Villaruz) and radiation oncologist (Dr. McCall) at UPMC in Pittsburgh yesterday en route from visiting family in Grand Rapids, MI. The main nodule we were watching grew by another millimeter or so. Dr. Villaruz described it as “indolent.” I asked what that meant and as she started to say “growing very slowly,” I recognized the word and blurted out “lazy!” I remarked I’d never heard indolent used in a medical context, and Dr. Villaruz said she’d never heard of it outside of medicine. So we both learned something. She and Dr. McCall said that there is no urgency, but that within the next 9-12 months, they would want to radiate the more clearly defined nodule and another one close to it. A third one looks like “ground glass,” a term for something that is hazy and not quite solid, but you can’t radiate something that is ill-defined and can’t be clearly imaged. It will be much easier to do radiation in the summer than during a busy semester or the winter b...

Four years

Sunday, June 14 marked 4 years since I was diagnosed with lung cancer while living in Hamburg. Those of you who have followed my journey from the start know that my family and I went to hell and back several times during those first six months. Here I am before, during, and after. The photo below was the last taken before my life unraveled. I went on a photography outing with the American Women's Club of Hamburg. When my doctor said my x-ray showed "infiltration" and I should get a CT scan, I put it off for a day so I wouldn't miss this event. That's how unconcerned I was. The possibility of cancer never crossed my mind, despite my severe shortness of breath. This was my hospital room at the LungenClinic, where I learned my shocking diagnosis. I was sitting at the little table with the doctors and Leland was on Zoom. Leland had to travel to the hospital by train (an hour-plus trip) before we could process the news together, shellshocked. This photo shows me in the...