Skip to main content

wait and see or radiation?

Leland and I made the trek to Pittsburgh 1.5 weeks ago for my regular appointment, the first since my scan in March showed another 1mm growth on a nodule and my pulmonologist freaked out. First, a resident met with us. (We'd met him once before in the last couple years.) He laid out various scenarios -- wait and see, get radiation done now or in the future -- and then said I could also "wait until symptoms develop." This seemed like an obviously terrible idea. So I said, "Um, by the time I noticed symptoms in Germany, my lungs were full of cancer..." Then he kind of backtracked. He also asked, "So, what do you think you want to do?" as if that little 10-minute talk was sufficient to make a decision. I replied, "Wait to talk to Dr. Villaruz and the radiologist." So that was definitely a less-than-helpful discussion. 

When I mentioned the "wait until symptoms develop" comment to Dr. Villaruz she immediately said, we would notice any changes in the CT scans long before symptoms appear. So I really have no idea was the resident was talking about. 

At any rate, she and the radiologist agreed that there is no urgency because the nodule is small and growth is very slow. The radiologist also showed us another small nodule close to the 13mm one that could be zapped at the same time. The options were to do radiation now or to do a regular scan in July and then do radiation if the nodule has grown more (or even continue scanning and monitoring). We opted to do the scan in July and go from there. 

If the nodule grows and we decide on radiation, then I will have to get various scans to "map" the area and also be fitted into a mold to keep my body in place during the procedure. SBRT (Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy) is highly precise; the beams are less than a half-millimeter wide. There would be 1-5 treatments (number TBD based on scans), each lasting 15-45 minutes, typically done on consecutive days. The UPMC Altoona Hospital will soon be getting an SBRT machine, so I could have this done 45 minutes from here instead of having to drive 2.75 hours each way. It seems fatigue is the main side effect. 

Now I just need to relay all this to my pulmonologist and make sure he is on the same page with the oncologist and radiologist. I am not dwelling on it -- just trying to get through the semester!

Comments

  1. AnonymousApril 26, 2026 at 4:50 PM

    Dear Esther, I always look forward to your updates. Your ability to remain so positive in the midst of personal and external chaos is truly inspiring. I find myself learning from your interactions with medical personnel and thinking about how we might channel those experiences into improved care for everyone. Just being better active listeners (a nod to the resident interaction).Take good care of yourself, and I wish you a strong finish to the semester. I’m returning to my grading now with a much brighter outlook! :-) Best, Leslie Cordie

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

regular update

I had my regular oncology appointment in Pittsburgh yesterday. Dr. Villaruz said the scans look good and everything is stable. Although I don’t have much scanxiety nowadays, it’s always a relief to get good news. Just to be sure that my understanding was correct, I asked her why I’m not a candidate for surgery. It’s because of the cancer’s growth pattern. The one nodule that’s visible on the CT scan could just be scarring; she’s not sure if it’s a tumor. When I was diagnosed, I was told the lung cancer was “lepidic.” This means that the tumor cells were growing along the lining of the alveolar structures (air sacs).* That’s why my lungs looked like they were draped in cobwebs. You can’t do surgery in enough places to get all of it. Thankfully, Tagrisso swept out those cobwebs – and continues to do so. We go back in December for a regular appointment. *Lepidic spread tends to be slow-growing, with minimal invasion of nearby tissues, less chance of metastasis, and overall better progno...
10 comments
Read more

38.6 months

September 18 marked 38.6 months (3 years, 2 months, 18 days) since I first started taking Tagrisso. Why is 38.6 months significant? Because it is the median overall survival in the FLAURA study, a landmark study (2014-16) comparing Tagrisso and older targeted therapies among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutation, and no prior treatment. 279 patients received Tagrisso and 277 people received an older drug (in addition, all patients received at least one dose of a trial drug). Nearly 58% of patients had died when data collection stopped. However, patients in the Tagrisso group lived nearly 7 months longer (median) than the control group. When Leland and I initially read that number – 38.6 months – in the Tagrisso promotional materials, we were stunned. This was supposed to be good news? The median age in the FLAURA study was 64 and at the time (August 2022), I had just turned 50. But still, it was a sobering statistic. For the longest time, I didn't feel ...
14 comments
Read more

A failure of institutional care

I just hit "send" on this letter to my dean and associate dean. Mic drop. I've never sent such a scathing letter, but it's definitely called for in this situation. I'm not expecting anything other than a "Oh, that wasn't how we intended to make you feel; our hands were tied" email. Dear Dean Lawless and Associate Dean Lloyd, When I wrote to Professor Land [my department head] to see if I could get a course release this fall due to having lung cancer plus complications from pulmonary embolism and COVID, I had no idea what I was in for. When faculty friends in other colleges have had health crises (ones that don’t warrant a full-semester medical leave), their department head or dean has simply said, “Don’t worry about teaching this semester. We’ll figure it out.” I figured the same would happen in my case. To be blunt, the way that my case was handled was a colossal failure of leadership. As my husband and I have shared my story with colleagues at PSU ...
26 comments
Read more