Skip to main content

pulmonary function test results

It's time to report my bi-annual pulmonary function test results. Drum roll... I am continuing to improve, although my pulmonologist told me that I will plateau at some point. In addition to Tagrisso working its magic, I have to think that strength training and biking (including 2 short interval training [SIT] workouts/week) are a big contributing factor.

The percentage below indicates my result compared to the expected result for a woman my age.
FEV1 (forced expiratory volume) measures the air you exhale in 1 second.
May 2024: 98% (34% improvement since 10/22)
Nov. 2023: 95%
May 2023: 91%
Oct. 2022: 73%
TLC (total lung capacity) is the total volume of air in the lungs after inhaling as much as possible.
May 2024: 102% !! (48% improvement since 6/22)
Nov. 2023: 95%
May 2023: 83%
Oct. 2022: 72%
Jun. 2022: 69%
DLCO (diffusing capacity of lung for carbon monoxide, aka diffusion) is the extent to which oxygen passes from the lungs into the blood. It indicates the extent of lung damage. I have improved 110% since June 2022, when I was first diagnosed with lung cancer. Although 86% is within normal range, I believe this figure explains why I still need supplemental O2 when doing more strenuous exercises, like heavier lifts or those awful Bulgarian/rear-foot elevated split squats.
May 2024: 86%
Nov. 2023: 82%
May 2023: 68%
Oct. 2022: 49%
Jun. 2022: 41%

FYI, for comparison, Normal DLCO = >75% of predicted; Mild = 60% to 75%; Moderate = 40% to 60%; and Severe = <40%. So I started out borderline severe, graduated to moderate, then mild, and now normal since Nov. 2023.
Together, these results explain why I can now walk uphill from downtown and not feel out of breath.
I've now graduated to lung testing every 8-9 months. For once, I'm an outlier because of how much I've improved rather than all the things that have gone wrong.

Comments

  1. This is such great news Esther. I can't help but think that your very hard physical work to recover plays a huge role in those great numbers. You have much to be proud of. You're a warrior!!

    ReplyDelete
  2. Woohoo Ester ! You have taken huge leaps and conquered !

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you! Still working on the conquering part...

      Delete
  3. Awesome news, Esther! You are rocking this! And thanks for explaining all the acronyms — I need this all the time with medical data!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Yes, I have them written down because I can never remember what they mean.

      Delete
  4. Hooray! So glad to hear this!

    ReplyDelete
  5. You're everyone's role model and your recovery is inspiring. Probably helps that you've been pretty much a lifelong fitness fanatic, and that your family, for that matter, similarly spends fewer than 10 hours/day in front of a television

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Thank you, David. You're right about lifelong fitness...but you underestimate how much TV we watch. :) Leland and I watch 1-1.5 hours together every evening and Lily often joins us when not at vball. Plus Leland often watches stuff on his own. He often quotes The Simpsons: "TV gives so much and asks so little."

      Delete
  6. Great news, Esther! Very encouraging and motivational! My mother has lung problem and she is doing the physical training too. I know the oxygen level, it's good to learn other terms that you described and that the physical training is really helpful! Bo

    ReplyDelete
  7. All fantastic news Esther! God is good. You will continue to be healed! Keep moving forward & looking to the heavens for your help. Your help comes from the Lord. 🙏🏽

    ReplyDelete
  8. This report makes my heart sing! You've certainly done your part to make this report happen. You are a good role model for me, should I face a similar situation. Lois C

    ReplyDelete
  9. WOW!! Thanking & praising God for this tremendous improvement, Esther!! Those stats show your dramatic progress. Celebrating with you!!

    ReplyDelete
  10. Congratulations on being an 'outlier' in the other direction!!

    ReplyDelete

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

regular update

I had my regular oncology appointment in Pittsburgh yesterday. Dr. Villaruz said the scans look good and everything is stable. Although I don’t have much scanxiety nowadays, it’s always a relief to get good news. Just to be sure that my understanding was correct, I asked her why I’m not a candidate for surgery. It’s because of the cancer’s growth pattern. The one nodule that’s visible on the CT scan could just be scarring; she’s not sure if it’s a tumor. When I was diagnosed, I was told the lung cancer was “lepidic.” This means that the tumor cells were growing along the lining of the alveolar structures (air sacs).* That’s why my lungs looked like they were draped in cobwebs. You can’t do surgery in enough places to get all of it. Thankfully, Tagrisso swept out those cobwebs – and continues to do so. We go back in December for a regular appointment. *Lepidic spread tends to be slow-growing, with minimal invasion of nearby tissues, less chance of metastasis, and overall better progno...

38.6 months

September 18 marked 38.6 months (3 years, 2 months, 18 days) since I first started taking Tagrisso. Why is 38.6 months significant? Because it is the median overall survival in the FLAURA study, a landmark study (2014-16) comparing Tagrisso and older targeted therapies among patients with advanced non-small cell lung cancer, EGFR mutation, and no prior treatment. 279 patients received Tagrisso and 277 people received an older drug (in addition, all patients received at least one dose of a trial drug). Nearly 58% of patients had died when data collection stopped. However, patients in the Tagrisso group lived nearly 7 months longer (median) than the control group. When Leland and I initially read that number – 38.6 months – in the Tagrisso promotional materials, we were stunned. This was supposed to be good news? The median age in the FLAURA study was 64 and at the time (August 2022), I had just turned 50. But still, it was a sobering statistic. For the longest time, I didn't feel ...

A failure of institutional care

I just hit "send" on this letter to my dean and associate dean. Mic drop. I've never sent such a scathing letter, but it's definitely called for in this situation. I'm not expecting anything other than a "Oh, that wasn't how we intended to make you feel; our hands were tied" email. Dear Dean Lawless and Associate Dean Lloyd, When I wrote to Professor Land [my department head] to see if I could get a course release this fall due to having lung cancer plus complications from pulmonary embolism and COVID, I had no idea what I was in for. When faculty friends in other colleges have had health crises (ones that don’t warrant a full-semester medical leave), their department head or dean has simply said, “Don’t worry about teaching this semester. We’ll figure it out.” I figured the same would happen in my case. To be blunt, the way that my case was handled was a colossal failure of leadership. As my husband and I have shared my story with colleagues at PSU ...